Nnncontrastive rhetoric reaching to intercultural rhetoric pdf

Kerschbaum establishes a critical niche, a new front line, in our ongoing efforts to understand how our students can make use of difference in their livesespecially as difference continues to thicken at every turn of their lived experience both in the writing classroom and out. Edited by ulla connor, ed nagelhout, and william rozycki find, read and cite. The term was first coined by the american applied linguist robert kaplan in 1966 to denote eclecticism and subsequent growth of collective knowledge in. Exploring relations with rhetoric, the common ancestor, is a way to bring the two communities into dialogue. In rhetoric classes, students learn to think logically, to. Contrastive rhetoric is the study of how a persons first language and his or her culture influence writing in a second language or how a common language is used among different cultures. In a multicultural interethnic, intercultural, or transcultural classroom and world, it no longer makes sense to separate as much as we have the study of first language l1 and secondlanguage l2 writing. This chapter provides the linguistic base to intercultural rhetorical research, exploring theories of. Classical rhetoric is a combination of persuasion and argument, broken into three branches and five canons as dictated by the greek teachers. Journals in rhetoric program in writing and rhetoric. We use cookies to offer you a better experience, personalize content, tailor advertising, provide social media features, and better understand the use of our services.

Intercultural rhetoric research is interdisciplinary in its theoretical and methodological orientation. Rhetoric and composition an introduction rhetoric and composition is an academic discipline that informs all other fields in teaching students how to communicate their ideas and construct their arguments. Kaplan in connor, 1996 reasserted that contrastive rhetoric was not meant as a teaching. Youll study the complex ways in which we communicate with each other, through the media and facetoface, with words and without, at. I hope that enough has been said to show that the question what is a rhetorical situation. It contains databased studies in specific genres, pedagogical issues, and future directions. Contrastive rhetoric began in 1966 as the result of a selfinitiated study of international students writing in english by kaplan, who then made the pronouncement that each language and each culture has a paragraph order unique to itself, and that part of the learning of a particular language is the mastery of its logical system kaplan, 1966. Nov, 2012 contrastive rhetoric contrastive rhetoric is the study of how a persons first language and culture influence hisher writing in a second language. Communication and rhetoric college degree programs the. Dwight atkinson 2004 wrote about the need for contrastive rhetoric to change its conceptualization. In toward a new rhetoric of difference, stephanie l. Technological advances and organizational behavior explores the theory and practice of rhetoric and professional communication in intercultural contexts. Intercultural rhetoric and professional communication. Journals in rhetoric searchable databases of research in rhetoric rhetorical scholarship tends to be classed with its disciplinary object of study, so that a study of rhetoric in medicine would be found with medical works, a study of rhetoric in architecture would be.

They may also wonder why intercultural rhetoric, the latest incarnation of what was. Why intercultural rhetoric needs critical and corpusbased. It is easy to argue that the need for attention to how we navigate rhetorically within and across cultures has never been greater, given everincreasing global migrations and seemingly instantaneous global communication. Intercultural rhetoric connor major reference works wiley. They aim to make comparisons, to evoke tender emotions, to censure rivals, and all this is done to persuade listeners. Contrastive rhetoric cr started as linguistic text analysis which aimed to identify problems in essays written by english as a second language esl students in university classes due to the interference caused by cultural and linguistic conventions. It investigates the influence of chinese rhetoric on expository writing in english by three groups.

English language teacher education and contrastive rhetoric laura m. Although rhetoric has been a popular area of study since antiquity, the department focuses on such contemporary matters as political campaigning, culture and communication, social movement rhetoric, ethics and persuasion, the nature of public argument, discourse and knowledge, the formation. There was a right way of doing things a way that was established and accepted. Arrangement the order in which the content is organized for a communication think fiveparagraph essay. The early contrastive rhetoricbased pedagogy, however, uncritically accepted what some researchers e. Implications for the current teaching of english writing at universities in japan ferred patterns of writing are genre dependent. It has grown dramatically to become a cornerstone of many undergraduate courses and curricula, and it is a. Aug 28, 20 this model is a valuable tool for intercultural rhetoric. Purpose kaplans 1966 article connecting student writers paragraph organization with their cultural thought patternsalso known as contrastive rhetorichas had a. This chapter provides the linguistic base to intercultural rhetorical research, exploring theories of linguistic relativity and contrastive rhetoric. This volume explores the field of contrastive rhetoric, the study of how a persons first language and culture influence his or her writing in a second language. The focus are the role of first language conventions of discourse and rhetoric structure on second language usage, as well as cognitive and cultural dimensions of transfer, particularly in. From contrastive to intercultural rhetoric why studying.

Can we connect rhetoric, or discourse, with culture without oversim. Youll learn much more than how to be a powerful, persuasive speaker. Exploring relations with rhetoric, the common ancestor, is. It presents a comprehensive view of the research in this field, emphasizing the connections between contrastive rhetoric and the related disciplines of composition studies, cultural anthropology, translation studies, and text linguistics. Rhetoric is useful 1 because things that are true and things that are just have a natural tendency to prevail over their opposites, so that if. Contrastive rhetoric cr started as linguistic text analysis which aimed to identify problems in essays written by english as a second language esl students in university classes due to the interference caused by cultural and linguistic conventions of the writers first language connor, 1996, kaplan, 1966. These were the points of pedagogical instruction for rhetoric. Intercultural rhetoric connor major reference works. View intercultural communication and rhetoric research papers on academia. Reaching to intercultural rhetoric 2008 points out that the field of ir needs to develop an effective and commonly agreedupon construct for culture for the field to continue p. The utility which rhetoric was to serve was the maintenance of harmony. Second language writing from an intercultural rhetoric. It posits that there are various overlapping social institutions and practices in a classroom, such as national culture, professionalacademic culture, student culture, etc. This book provides a framework for translating, localizing, and internationalizing communications and information products around the world.

It presents a comprehensive view of the research in this field, emphasizing the connections between contrastive rhetoric and the related disciplines of composition studies, cultural. The term was first coined by the american applied linguist robert kaplan in 1966 to denote eclecticism and subsequent growth of collective knowledge in certain languages. Rhetoric, as explained above, is a tool for writers and orators which empowers them to convince their readers and listeners about their point of view. From contrastive rhetoric to intercultural rhetoric semantic scholar. Why intercultural rhetoric needs critical and corpusbased approaches.

Intercultural rhetoric ir is the study of written discourse between and among individuals with different cultural backgrounds. Intercultural rhetoric intercultural rhetoric is defined as the study of discourse between and among individuals from different cultural backgrounds. In may, you will put all that you have learned to the test literally. Liebman, 1992 call old con trastive rhetoric, while failing to evolve with the subsequent development of new contrastive rhetoric research. The way to this goal was through ceremony, etiquette, and methodology. The book ends with a look to the future, suggesting it is more accurate to use the term intercultural rhetoric to account for the richness of rhetoric variation of written texts and the varying contexts in which they are constructed. Pdf a contrastive study of the rhetorical organisation of.

Pdf on dec 23, 2008, will baker and others published contrastive rhetoric. Intercultural studies in the arab world from a contrastive rhetoric. This contrastive study is concerned with relations between rhetoric and ethnicity in second language l2 writing. Chinese writers of english ras as creators of a research space in a national context, intercultural perspectives on research writing, 10. Reaching to intercultural rhetoric ulla connor indiana university. If youve answered yes, you may want to consider majoring in communication and rhetoric. The importance of comparable data in crosscultural studies core. The ap language exam throughout this entire course we will focus on the power of rhetoric. Rhetoric teaches us the essential skills of advanced learning and higher education. Intercultural provides an appropriate connotation of collaborative interaction between and among cultures, on one hand, and within cultures on the other connor, 2011, p.

Rhetoric is not just empty words or fine political speeches. Reaching to intercultural rhetoric 2008 points out that the field of ir. Contrastive rhetoric is the study of the ways in which the rhetorical structures of a persons native language may interfere with efforts to write in a second language l2. An introduction diane belcher and gayle nelson some who see the title of our book for the first time may well wonder why critical and corpusbased approaches would be combined in one volume. Contrastive rhetoric is an area of research that studies discourse differences between. Yet, the conceptual basis of intercultural rhetoric also known in the past as. A response to what said has said 34 anything, or whether any and all representations, because they are representations, are embedded first in the language then in the culture, institutions, and political ambience of the representer interwoven with a. A read is counted each time someone views a publication summary such as the title, abstract, and list of authors, clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the fulltext. Rhetoric is the study and art of writing and speaking well, being persuasive, and knowing how to compose successful writing and presentations. Contrastive rhetoric contrastive rhetoric is the study of how a persons first language and culture influence hisher writing in a second language. As the most updated edited volume, this book provides a range of foci, perspectives, and approaches to contrastive intercultural rhetoric studies. Despite years of intense criticism of contrastive intercultural rhetoric, theoretical debate, and controversy, there has been a recent resurgence in the number of high quality pedagogical studies concerning the teaching of intercultural rhetoric in university writing classes for eastasian chinese, japanese, and korean writers.

In this chapter, i discuss the expansion of contrastive rhetoric in light of new understandings in discourse, text analysis, cultural studies, and intercultural. Reaching to intercultural rhetoric ulla connor indiana universitypurdue university indianapolis in press, contrastive rhetoric. Rhetoric is useful 1 because things that are true and things that are just have a natural tendency to prevail over their opposites, so that if the decisions of judges are not what they ought to be. She is most recently coeditor with diane belcher of reflections on multiliterate lives 2001 and author of contrastive rhetoric. Eric ej822458 the generic and rhetorical structures of. Colombo the contested place of cr studies for improperly grouping lan born within the frame of applied linguistics and secondlanguage acquisition, contrastive rhetoric cr is an interdisciplinary field that has led to some very productive.

Often, we find rhetoric examples in religious sermons and political speeches. Ir in l2 writing pedagogy examines the influences of language, culture, and education on the production of texts with the aim of advancing intercultural communication research as well as informing writers, editors, translators, instructors, and also language learners. Rhetoric, professional communication, globalization. Ulla connor is a researcher in intercultural communication and linguistics, and has published widely in the areas of literacy and secondlanguage writing. Rhetoric in chinese society thus came to be very much akin to sheer propriety. Intercultural communication and rhetoric research papers. The rhetoric and language studies area focuses on how human symbols affect social and political change. Crosscultural aspects of second language writing 1996. Orientalism and contrastive intercultural rhetoric.

1441 354 415 1566 303 1014 1334 1233 730 108 507 1015 474 1110 524 1471 1548 519 363 1053 342 987 1531 839 1343 1474 102 253 62 1343 458 720 916 76